Hi, I have had this problem twice in 6 rolls. I think that if if pay close attention to the alignment during takeup then things are ok. This is not something I can just do quickly (or I get the problem you mentioned).
Mark [email protected] http://www.interwalk.com/pinhole.htm -- Original Message -- >Following the discussion of lens flare with the Zero Image 6x9 leads me to >relay a >problem I have with my new 6x9. Film wound through the camera does not wind >tightly >on the take-up spool. Film is so loose it sometimes binds and I cannot wind >the last >few frames. Needless to say, loose winding leaves film edges open to light >leaks. >Anyone else experience this problem? If so, have you found a solution? > >David > >pinhole-discussion-request@p at ??????? wrote: > >> Send Pinhole-Discussion mailing list submissions to >> pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/pinhole-discussion >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> pinhole-discussion-request@p at ??????? >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??????? >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of Pinhole-Discussion digest..." >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: "Lens" Flare... ZeroImage 6x9? ([email protected]) >> 2. Who we are? (Guy Glorieux) >> 3. Re: Who we are? (Jeff Dilcher) >> 4. Re: Determining exposure beyond..................... (Bill Erickson) >> 5. Who we are? (lva) >> >> --__--__-- >> >> Message: 1 >> From: [email protected] >> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:03:06 EDT >> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] "Lens" Flare... ZeroImage 6x9? >> To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? >> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? >> >> In a message dated 9/17/01 9:30:55 AM Central Daylight Time, >> [email protected] writes: >> >> << I think they mean "internal" reflection. Does anyone know >> if the newer cameras are less susceptible to flare? >> >> >> I have a Zero Image Multi Format which allows for 6cmX9cm images and have >> exposed films in the 6cmX9cm mode, and never had any problems with flare >.I >> purchased my camera in the early part of 2001 . >> Hope this may be of help . >> >> --__--__-- >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:57:57 -0400 >> From: Guy Glorieux <[email protected]> >> To: Pinhole List <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> >> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Who we are? >> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? >> >> Hey, Gregg! >> >> If you are around and have some free time, what about building a space >> on Pinhole Visions for those who want to identify themselves more >> permanently? Just a thought... >> >> Guy >> "Peace on earth to goodwill men and women" >> >> P.S. For those who don't know me yet, check my exhibition "Fragments... >> Dreams..." on Pinhole Visions at >> http://www.???????/exhibits/Glorieux/ >> >> ...-;) -:) >> >> P.P.S. We need all the -:)) 's we can get these days... >> >> --__--__-- >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:18:54 -0400 (EDT) >> From: Jeff Dilcher <[email protected]> >> To: Pinhole List <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> >> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Who we are? >> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? >> >> I like that idea. >> I'll include an ascii art self portrait of myself... >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Guy Glorieux wrote: >> >> > Hey, Gregg! >> > >> > If you are around and have some free time, what about building a space >> > on Pinhole Visions for those who want to identify themselves more >> > permanently? Just a thought... >> > >> > Guy >> > "Peace on earth to goodwill men and women" >> > >> > P.S. For those who don't know me yet, check my exhibition "Fragments... >> > Dreams..." on Pinhole Visions at >> > http://www.???????/exhibits/Glorieux/ >> > >> > ...-;) -:) >> > >> > P.P.S. We need all the -:)) 's we can get these days... >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list >> > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? >> > unsubscribe or change your account at >> > http://www.???????/discussion/ >> > >> >> --__--__-- >> >> Message: 4 >> From: "Bill Erickson" <[email protected]> >> To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> >> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Determining exposure >> beyond..................... >> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:19:21 -0500 >> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? >> >> I've had no experience with ilford HP%, and each BW film has it's own >> requirement. my general advice is expose longer than you think necessary >> and it'll probably be OK. The reciprocity failure you're trying to >> compensate for in fact buffers the overexposure error. >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Rune Tallaksen" <[email protected]> >> To: "Pinhole-Discussion" <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> >> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:01 AM >> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Determining exposure >> beyond..................... >> >> > Hi list! >> > >> > Can anybody help me with how to determine exposure when correcting for >> > resiprosity failure when the measured esposuretime exceeds that of the >> table >> > from the filmvendor? >> > >> > For instance when using Ilford HP5 Plus, the film data sheet gives the >> added >> > time for resiprosity failure until initial measured 35 secs(corrected >for >> > pinhole f stop). How can I calculate the "correct" exposure time beyond >> this >> > point? Tiral and error until now has not been satisfactory for me. >> > >> > Any help will be appreciated. >> > >> > Rune >> > Norway >> > >> > __\/__ >> > ./ ^ _ \. >> > |\|(o)(o)|/| >> > #------------------.OOOo--oo--oOOO.--------------------# >> > # Rune Tallaksen # >> > # # >> > # # >> > #---------------------------Oooo.----------------------# >> > .oooO ( ) >> > ( ) )/ >> > \( (_/ >> > \_) >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list >> > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? >> > unsubscribe or change your account at >> > http://www.???????/discussion/ >> > >> >> --__--__-- >> >> Message: 5 >> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:23 +0200 >> From: "lva" <[email protected]> >> To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? >> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Who we are? >> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? >> >> > Hey, Gregg! >> > >> > If you are around and have some free time, what about building a space >> > on Pinhole Visions for those who want to identify themselves more >> > permanently? Just a thought... >> >> Pictures of the members of the list would also be great. When I read a >> good post, I always wonder how the person looks like who's written the >> text. >> >> Greetings from Sweden >> >> Brahma >> >> --__--__-- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list >> Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? >> http://www.???????/discussion/ >> >> End of Pinhole-Discussion Digest > > >_______________________________________________ >Pinhole-Discussion mailing list >Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? >unsubscribe or change your account at >http://www.???????/discussion/ >
