Following the discussion of lens flare with the Zero Image 6x9 leads me to relay a problem I have with my new 6x9. Film wound through the camera does not wind tightly on the take-up spool. Film is so loose it sometimes binds and I cannot wind the last few frames. Needless to say, loose winding leaves film edges open to light leaks. Anyone else experience this problem? If so, have you found a solution?
David pinhole-discussion-request@p at ??????? wrote: > Send Pinhole-Discussion mailing list submissions to > pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/pinhole-discussion > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > pinhole-discussion-request@p at ??????? > > You can reach the person managing the list at > pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??????? > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Pinhole-Discussion digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: "Lens" Flare... ZeroImage 6x9? ([email protected]) > 2. Who we are? (Guy Glorieux) > 3. Re: Who we are? (Jeff Dilcher) > 4. Re: Determining exposure beyond..................... (Bill Erickson) > 5. Who we are? (lva) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > From: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:03:06 EDT > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] "Lens" Flare... ZeroImage 6x9? > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > In a message dated 9/17/01 9:30:55 AM Central Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > << I think they mean "internal" reflection. Does anyone know > if the newer cameras are less susceptible to flare? > >> > I have a Zero Image Multi Format which allows for 6cmX9cm images and have > exposed films in the 6cmX9cm mode, and never had any problems with flare .I > purchased my camera in the early part of 2001 . > Hope this may be of help . > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:57:57 -0400 > From: Guy Glorieux <[email protected]> > To: Pinhole List <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Who we are? > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > Hey, Gregg! > > If you are around and have some free time, what about building a space > on Pinhole Visions for those who want to identify themselves more > permanently? Just a thought... > > Guy > "Peace on earth to goodwill men and women" > > P.S. For those who don't know me yet, check my exhibition "Fragments... > Dreams..." on Pinhole Visions at > http://www.???????/exhibits/Glorieux/ > > ...-;) -:) > > P.P.S. We need all the -:)) 's we can get these days... > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:18:54 -0400 (EDT) > From: Jeff Dilcher <[email protected]> > To: Pinhole List <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Who we are? > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > I like that idea. > I'll include an ascii art self portrait of myself... > > On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Guy Glorieux wrote: > > > Hey, Gregg! > > > > If you are around and have some free time, what about building a space > > on Pinhole Visions for those who want to identify themselves more > > permanently? Just a thought... > > > > Guy > > "Peace on earth to goodwill men and women" > > > > P.S. For those who don't know me yet, check my exhibition "Fragments... > > Dreams..." on Pinhole Visions at > > http://www.???????/exhibits/Glorieux/ > > > > ...-;) -:) > > > > P.P.S. We need all the -:)) 's we can get these days... > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > > unsubscribe or change your account at > > http://www.???????/discussion/ > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 4 > From: "Bill Erickson" <[email protected]> > To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Determining exposure > beyond..................... > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:19:21 -0500 > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > I've had no experience with ilford HP%, and each BW film has it's own > requirement. my general advice is expose longer than you think necessary > and it'll probably be OK. The reciprocity failure you're trying to > compensate for in fact buffers the overexposure error. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rune Tallaksen" <[email protected]> > To: "Pinhole-Discussion" <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:01 AM > Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Determining exposure > beyond..................... > > > Hi list! > > > > Can anybody help me with how to determine exposure when correcting for > > resiprosity failure when the measured esposuretime exceeds that of the > table > > from the filmvendor? > > > > For instance when using Ilford HP5 Plus, the film data sheet gives the > added > > time for resiprosity failure until initial measured 35 secs(corrected for > > pinhole f stop). How can I calculate the "correct" exposure time beyond > this > > point? Tiral and error until now has not been satisfactory for me. > > > > Any help will be appreciated. > > > > Rune > > Norway > > > > __\/__ > > ./ ^ _ \. > > |\|(o)(o)|/| > > #------------------.OOOo--oo--oOOO.--------------------# > > # Rune Tallaksen # > > # # > > # # > > #---------------------------Oooo.----------------------# > > .oooO ( ) > > ( ) )/ > > \( (_/ > > \_) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > > unsubscribe or change your account at > > http://www.???????/discussion/ > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:23 +0200 > From: "lva" <[email protected]> > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Who we are? > Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? > > > Hey, Gregg! > > > > If you are around and have some free time, what about building a space > > on Pinhole Visions for those who want to identify themselves more > > permanently? Just a thought... > > Pictures of the members of the list would also be great. When I read a > good post, I always wonder how the person looks like who's written the > text. > > Greetings from Sweden > > Brahma > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > http://www.???????/discussion/ > > End of Pinhole-Discussion Digest
