On Monday 30 August 2010 07:17:20 Søren Sandmann wrote: > From: Søren Sandmann Pedersen <[email protected]> > > Otherwise, accessor functions won't work. > --- > pixman/pixman-access.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/pixman/pixman-access.c b/pixman/pixman-access.c > index 56de711..f1ce0ba 100644 > --- a/pixman/pixman-access.c > +++ b/pixman/pixman-access.c > @@ -2425,11 +2425,11 @@ store_scanline_a2b2g2r2 (bits_image_t * image, > { > SPLIT_A (values[i]); > > - *(pixel++) = > - ((a ) & 0xc0) | > - ((b >> 2) & 0x30) | > - ((g >> 4) & 0x0c) | > - ((r >> 6) ); > + WRITE (image, pixel++, > + ((a ) & 0xc0) | > + ((b >> 2) & 0x30) | > + ((g >> 4) & 0x0c) | > + ((r >> 6) )); > } > }
Would it generally be a good idea to extend pixman tests to also cover the use of accessors? -- Best regards, Siarhei Siamashka
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
