"Michael Tautschnig" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi all, >> >> As per [1] I reviewed the current priority of clamav and its >dependency and it >> seems we are now relying on at least one package, libtommath, which >is priority >> extra only. >> >> As clamav IMHO matches the definition "likely to be useful if you >already know >> what they are" I would opt for downgrading the priority of clamav >instead of >> asking libtommath maintainers to upgrade their priority. >> >> Do others agree with this suggestion or would you have objections? >> > >Sorry, forgot to add the link: > >[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/01/msg00307.html > I think it's better to leave it optional since it's the primary (only?) anti-virus package in the archive. There are other optional packages that use libtomath that would benefit from it being made optional. Scott K _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
