On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 06:38:20 pm Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi Scott, > > [...] > > > I think it's better to leave it optional since it's the primary (only?) > > anti-virus package in the archive. There are other optional packages > > that use libtomath that would benefit from it being made optional. > > That's a very good point; would you have some package names for me - I > assume you already know where to look. If you could send them along, I'd > file a bug with the libtomath package to ask them to upgrade the priority. > > Thanks a lot, > Michael
dansguardian and klamav (in addition to various clamav binaries). This may not seem like very many, but it's three of the four rdepends. Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
