On 2014-07-07 00:44:48 [-0400], Scott Kitterman wrote: > It looks like havp is rather undermaintained, but wouldn't take a lot of work > to get it back into testing. Would anyone be willing to help out if I adopt > it into the team (I'll contact the existing maintainer first, I haven't done > that yet)?
Clamav seems quiet now and there isn't anything important on the list, right? So in that case I might help out if the other clamav related package are good to go. BUT before you go and adopt it, please make sure that it is really worth it. c-icap has a clamav plugin but uses the ICAP protocol (whatever that is) so it might not be a replacement for havp. Dansguardian on the other hand seems to do the same thing as havp (on the first look). The upstream of both project looks kind of dead. Last release in 2010 for havp vs an alpha release in 2012 for dansguardian. > Scott K Sebastian _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
