Hi Stephen,
On 13.07.2014 21:49, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Sunday, July 13, 2014 14:49:12 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
I converted clamav's debian/copyright to the DEP-5 format and also
updated it.
But I don't know what license/copyright should be mentioned for the
debian directory. (Only the clamav-config.1 man page has an explicit
license.)
What do you think?
I would view it as under the same license as the predominate license of the
package, but sgran is probably the one that should say since it's mostly his
work.
Do you concur with Scott's view, or should debian/copyright mention a
different license (than GPL-2) for the debian directory (like GPL-2+,
under which you licensed the clamav-config.1 man page)?
Best regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
