Hi, This one time, at band camp, Andreas Cadhalpun said: > Hi Stephen, > > On 13.07.2014 21:49, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >On Sunday, July 13, 2014 14:49:12 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > >>I converted clamav's debian/copyright to the DEP-5 format and also > >>updated it. > >> > >>But I don't know what license/copyright should be mentioned for the > >>debian directory. (Only the clamav-config.1 man page has an explicit > >>license.) > >> > >>What do you think? > > > >I would view it as under the same license as the predominate license of the > >package, but sgran is probably the one that should say since it's mostly his > >work. > > Do you concur with Scott's view, or should debian/copyright mention > a different license (than GPL-2) for the debian directory (like > GPL-2+, under which you licensed the clamav-config.1 man page)?
I have no strong preference. GPL-2 is fine with me, but if you are inclined towards GPL-2+, that's also ok. Cheers, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [email protected] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
