On 2014-08-09 15:15:57 [-0400], Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I think we should upload this to experimental to reduce the risk of > > unpleasant surprises (e.g. on powerpc) after the final release. > > I agree. okay.
> > We could also include some/all of the changes from other packaging > > branches, i.e. libmspack, systemd and maybe also bigeasy. > > > > Upstream will probably apply some variation of these in the future, but > > likely not too soon... > > libmspack and systemd should definitely be included. bigeasy is just the > milter patch? I think that recently got committed upstream, but I'm not > sure. > We could certainly include it for experimental. > > If someone wants to prepare the package in git, I'm happy to upload it. No > need to make a separate experimental branch IMO as any future unstable upload > will derive directly from this one. I just pushed the beta1 into the unstable branch. I have to run now and I try to add the libmspack later… Side note: I added |+++ b/debian/libclamav6.symbols |@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ libclamav.so.6 libclamav6 #MINVER# |+ cl_engine_set_clcb_file_props@CLAMAV_PUBLIC 0.98.5~beta1+dfsg-1 | cl_engine_set_clcb_hash@CLAMAV_PUBLIC 0.98.1 I remember that dfsg-1 was wrong and the debian version should go away. However I am uncomfortable adding 0.98.5 since it is not out (yet). Should we keep it as-is and string everything past 0.98.5 once it is out? > Scott K Sebastian _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
