On August 12, 2014 11:06:43 PM EDT, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: >On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 23:15:17 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >> On 12.08.2014 22:58, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> > On August 12, 2014 4:53:02 PM EDT, Andreas Cadhalpun ><[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On 12.08.2014 21:57, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> >>> The problem is >> >>> >> >> >http://www.cabextract.org.uk/libmspack/doc/mspack_8h.html#a3a94be2216dd1 >> >> e835733acb7c4645fca>> >> >>> clamav is compiled without LFS, libmspack is compiled _with_ LFS >> >>> support. So off_t has different size. >> >> >> >> Then the obvious fix is to add '-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64' to CFLAGS. >> >> >> >> This fixed the test failures on i386. Does this have any >disadvantage? >> >> >> >> It would probably be best to add a check to configure.ac testing >what >> >> off_t size libmspack uses and adding this flag depending on the >result. >> > >> > I recall reading something about a autotools bug that caused this. >We >> > should be building with LFS generally, I think. Please go ahead. >> OK, I added it now to CFLAGS. > >Thanks. It passed the tests here now too, so I think it's worth >inflicting on >the world. Uploaded to experimental.
The results on other architectures don't look so great. I already retried armhf and powerpc, to no avail. Scott K _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
