Hi Sebastian,

On 08.11.2015 15:06, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> That said I hacked up something that is half way done i.e. not complete
> or tested.  I used nftw() and a mutex() since the function passed to
> nftw() can't have a private argument and I kind of need it for struct
> onas_ht *ht. And after seeing that thing above I was thinking about
> pulling in fts() from glibc to remain bug compatible with upstream. And
> then I was thinking about stable + oldstable and the amount of non-upstream
> code we are pushing there I was thinking:
>       HEY! What about disabling FANOTIFY which disables this feature
>       and we don't have to worry about this and we enable it once
>       glibc 2.23 hits unstable?
> 
> Any thoughts on this? We should react soon I think since we need to pass
> the new queue.

I think it would be better to disable LFS instead: it is not enabled upstream
and we only recently enabled it.

Maybe filing a clamav upstream bug about this problem might be the way to go?
Perhaps they can help adapting the code to nftw.

Best regards,
Andreas

_______________________________________________
Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel

Reply via email to