On 2015-11-08 11:37:46 [-0500], Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >Any thoughts on this? We should react soon I think since we need to
> >pass
> >the new queue.
> 
> Glibc 2.21 will be in unstable soon at which point 2.22 will go to 
> Experimental.  I understand the release date for 2.23 is undetermined.  Is 
> the glibc change something that could be back ported?

I doubt because those symbols would be versioned. And even if they would
do this for unstable this does not solve our proble for stable.

> I would seriously like to avoid disabling fanotify , since that would be a 
> regression and I know people use the feature.

Ah okay. I assumed this is all new 0.99 stuff. In that case it is not an
option.

> 
> Scott K

Sebastian

_______________________________________________
Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel

Reply via email to