Thiemo Seufer wrote: [snip] > > and then several architectures on which there are no binaries (alpha, > > mipsel, sparc), but that shouldn't block the other architectures, > > should it? > > There _are_ binaries for these three in lenny, but not in sid, this > blocks testing migration. > > Given the bootstrap problem, we should IMHO rather get SBCL going > again on those architectures than ask for removal of the 0.9.16 > binaries from lenny. > > The current state (from a upstream perspective) is: > - sparc should be fine. In Debian it fails due to a (unrelated) > ghostscript bug when building documentation. > - alpha FTBFS, this is caused by a bug in the alpha support, fixed > upstream > - mipsel fails because it needs to be re-bootstrapped from a newer > SBCL than 1.0.10. This was a mips/mipsel specific bug.
I re-bootstrapped mipsel now. Thiemo _______________________________________________ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel
