also sprach Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.10.0948 +0200]: > Are you being presented with an editor at this point?
Yes.
> Assuming you were being presented with an editor, this is due to
> the changes requested in #402531 ("format commit messages better
> for git"). The first full change is unfolded for use as a template
> summary line and prepended to the full list of changes. An editor
> is then spawned so that you can edit the summary as desired. This
> is documented :-)
Ah, okay... that makes sense and logcheck-database just isn't the
best.
Anyway¸ I am not sure I agree with the heuristics in general.
debian/changelog isn't exactly suitable for git commit messages.
But then I/we should really rather concentrate on generating
debian/changelog from commit logs rather than the other way around.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"getting a scsi chain working is perfectly simple if you remember that
there must be exactly three terminations: one on one end of the
cable, one on the far end, and the goat, terminated over the scsi
chain with a silver-handled knife whilst burning *black* candles."
-- anthony deboer
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
