>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~comay/webrev-builds/
Thanks for the review, Danek.
> There are a handful of packages which disappeared between 75 and 79. Why
> are you creating empty packages for them?
As Bart mentioned, this seemed to be the best way to deal with the EOFs
of existing packages. I think all of the packages in question
(<pkgname>.78) have a comment in them to that explains this, no?
> There's noise in the *_attr files because NWS seems to be updating them
> now, too. Can we clean these up?
Fixed.
> In SUNWgnome-remote-desktop.78, are we dropping vncviewer.1 because it's
> replaced by the same file in SUNWvncviewer? How does this work in the WOS?
SUNWgnome-remote-desktop still delivers other content like
vino-server. It's just that since the version of the GNOME package we
get is the "special" compiled-against-FOX version from the slim_stage
area, it still includes vncviewer.1, hence the drop.
This will be fixed when we move to updated GNOME bits or drop the
special version completely.
> Shouldn't SUNWjmgts and SUNWkmgts go into common/loc?
Yes, good catch.
> SUNWvim should be version 7.1.145.
I thought about that but didn't include the ".145" microversion
originally since not all 145 patches are included. But since I don't
know of a better version number (as 7.1 isn't really accurate either),
I'll add the microversion.
I've updated the special webrev
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~comay/webrev-builds/
dsc
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
