On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 12:25:36AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~comay/webrev-builds/ > >> There are a handful of packages which disappeared between 75 and 79. Why >> are you creating empty packages for them? > > As Bart mentioned, this seemed to be the best way to deal with the EOFs > of existing packages. I think all of the packages in question > (<pkgname>.78) have a comment in them to that explains this, no?
It explains what, but not why, and the why is not obvious. >> In SUNWgnome-remote-desktop.78, are we dropping vncviewer.1 because it's >> replaced by the same file in SUNWvncviewer? How does this work in the >> WOS? > > SUNWgnome-remote-desktop still delivers other content like > vino-server. It's just that since the version of the GNOME package we > get is the "special" compiled-against-FOX version from the slim_stage > area, it still includes vncviewer.1, hence the drop. Okay, I see. >> SUNWvim should be version 7.1.145. > > I thought about that but didn't include the ".145" microversion > originally since not all 145 patches are included. But since I don't > know of a better version number (as 7.1 isn't really accurate either), > I'll add the microversion. Yeah. The patches that aren't included are not included because they don't apply -- they're Windows or Mac or Amiga specific. So the patchlevel really can be considered 145. Thanks! Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
