On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:04 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the current code, you can run into a fair amount of trouble if you
> install a set of packages and then change the preferred authority. The
> preferred authority specifies the location from where packages are
> obtained when the user doesn't explicitly declare an authority in the
> FMRI.
>
> This wad should eliminate the most common problems that occur if you
> install from one repository, and then re-configure the client
> to install from a different preferred authority.
>
> Webrev is here:
>
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johansen/pkg_auth2/
image.py
=====
544 + # then return the catalog for the preferred authority
Nit: missing period at end of sentence.
611 721 """Determine whether fmri and pfmri share
the same package
623 733 # If the catalog has a rename record that
names fmri as a
Nit: shouldn't those be cfmri instead of fmri?
I didn't see any new api tests for the new functions. Intentional?
imageconfig.py
=========
Please update the copyright year.
imageplan.py
========
Please update the copyright year.
fmri.py
====
Please update the copyright year.
I didn't see any new api tests for the new functions. Intentional?
Overall
====
I'm happy with this overall, great to see this!
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." -
Robert Orben
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
