Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: > Thanks, it all makes sense. Am I right thinking that all the > pieces needed to make this work are already implemented? > One thing I couldn't find is how to specify minimum, maximum > or exact versions for dependencies. >
The entire dependency evaluation process is getting re-done in order to support back-tracking. Once this is in place, all the dependency types will work. Right now, we have minimum & optional vs required mostly working :-). > Also, will there be an attribute for hiding the empty > (e.g. renamed or otherwise obsoleted) packages? > I think they would be rather confusing to appear in the package > lists. > On the client side, we'll work out how to delete them... on the server, the old versions will still need to be there... once you publish a package, right now it's there forever... - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts "You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird." _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
