Danek Duvall wrote: > I've gotten myself into what might be an odd situation. My two authorities > are cyber and ipkg.sfbay, with the latter as my preferred authority, but > the former has newer packages. > > In particular, both have packages with versions @...-0.91, but cyber has > newer timestamps available than ipkg. > > Okay, that's fine. But when resolving a dependency that is stated with an > untimestamped version, should I choose the latest version, or the version > from my default authority? Given that the authority shouldn't matter in > which I choose, I'd guess that choosing the latest version is more > important, but I wondered if anyone else had an opinion on the subject. I > think the current code will choose preferred authority over version, FWIW.
do you really mean "over version" or "over timestamp", which you referred to previously? Michael -- Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion' _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
