Consider this case: Authority a has [EMAIL PROTECTED] and is the preferred authority. Authority b has [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Based on reading the image.make_install_plan method, pkg install foo selects pkg://a/[EMAIL PROTECTED] to install. Is that the expected behavior? Now consider another case starting with the same situation above. Another package in authority a, [EMAIL PROTECTED] has a required dependency on foo (target=foo). The command: pkg install bar Will select pkg://b/[EMAIL PROTECTED] since the dependency evaluation logic in imageplan.evaluate_fmri doesn't make a distinction between the preferred and non-preferred authorities. Is that the expected behavior? Together, these seem to be inconsistent with one another. Thoughts? Thanks. Tom _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
