Tom Mueller (pkg-discuss) wrote: > Consider this case: > > Authority a has [EMAIL PROTECTED] and is the preferred authority. > Authority b has [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Based on reading the image.make_install_plan method, > > pkg install foo > > selects pkg://a/[EMAIL PROTECTED] to install. > > Is that the expected behavior?
I believe so. > Now consider another case starting with the same situation above. > Another package in authority a, [EMAIL PROTECTED] has a required dependency > on foo > (target=foo). The command: > > pkg install bar > > Will select pkg://b/[EMAIL PROTECTED] since the dependency evaluation logic > in > imageplan.evaluate_fmri doesn't make a distinction between the preferred > and non-preferred authorities. > > Is that the expected behavior? Not to me. > Together, these seem to be inconsistent with one another. I agree. > Thoughts? I'd wait until Bart has a chance to sort out the various issues we currently have with authorities. -- Shawn Walker | Solaris Kernel | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | blogs.sun.com/srw _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
