Stephen Hahn wrote:
> * Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-20 19:09]:
>> I think I may have chosen a poor name for the setting :/
> 
>   There's plenty of time to change it.  Surely the blog and content
>   management software packages must have a name for this we can reuse
>   (if it's better).

I used --proxy-base/proxy_base CherryPy calls it "tools.proxy.base" 
internally.

Looking at various CMSs (Graffiti, Joomla, Mambo, etc.) and blog 
software packages, I see that they call it "base URL" (or some minor 
variation thereof).  I found a few that called it "proxy URL" (very few).

As such, would --proxy-base-url/proxy_base_url suffice?

Any comments from others?

Thanks,
-- 
Shawn Walker
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to