On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 02:41:40PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote: > Stephen Hahn wrote: > > * Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-20 19:09]: > >> I think I may have chosen a poor name for the setting :/ > > > > There's plenty of time to change it. Surely the blog and content > > management software packages must have a name for this we can reuse > > (if it's better). > > I used --proxy-base/proxy_base CherryPy calls it "tools.proxy.base" > internally. > > Looking at various CMSs (Graffiti, Joomla, Mambo, etc.) and blog > software packages, I see that they call it "base URL" (or some minor > variation thereof). I found a few that called it "proxy URL" (very few). > > As such, would --proxy-base-url/proxy_base_url suffice?
Admittedly, I'm not terribly familiar with this world, but the word "proxy" in any of it seems a bit strange to me. I would simply drop that portion from the lingo, leaving --base-url/base_url. But perhaps having "proxy" makes more sense in this context than not having it. Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
