On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 08:07:49PM -0700, Brock Pytlik wrote: > Danek Duvall wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 05:16:28PM -0700, Brock Pytlik wrote: > > > > > >> ii) pkg install, image-update will have an option (-d?) > >> > > > > I'd use --no-refresh. Long option because it's unlikely to be needed > > terribly often. And it would always take an argument -- perhaps a > > comma-separated list of authority names, with "all" turning into a reserved > > authority name signifying all authorities. > > > > > Ok, I like --no-refresh. I'm fine with using "all" that way if others > are. I wasn't sure if we wanted to reserve authority names or not (al's > lovely location (of packages) == authority name "all"? ;) ) > >> will try to continue with the update, but if package comes from an > >> unreachable authority, it will fail, politely explaining what the > >> problem is. > >> > > > > Being polite is so passe. Be rude. Be really rude. Be BOFH rude. > > > > :) > > > ROFL, I hadn't heard of BOFH before. Quite the interesting reading. >
if you're not familiar with the BOFH, then you are automatically qualified for for PFY status, which is of course a BOFH in training. ;) ed _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
