[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I'm taking the general silence on this to mean there aren't major >> objections? >> > > No objections, but just one nit. > > >>> 1) Anytime set-authority is called, we refresh that new or changed >>> authority. (That part seemed uncontroversial the first time around.) >>> > > When the authority's origin is changed, you have to perform a full > refresh for that particular authority. There is already code in place > that notices when an origin has changed. Just be sure you don't regress > this particular corner-case, otherwise weird stuff will happen. > > Thanks for pointing this out. I'll make sure not to regress the behavior. Do you happen to know if we have a test case specifically for this? I'll look into it, and add one if we don't.
Brock > -j > _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
