>> Is, as Alan says, vncviewer broken? -1 to any OS without a working >> vncviewer. >> I would like to see this changed to pull in the older vncviewer, or to skip >> publishing it. Perhaps I missed that? > > Yes, vncviewer is broken in build 97 however there is a workaround and > I'm reluctant to change the standard build procedure for a annoying but > not fatal issue in a development build. If others feel strongly, we > can figure out how not to publish this package but I'd rather stay in > sync with SXCE here and pull the fix in build 98. >
There are some usages for which I find vino doesn't work adequately (and it is a lot more taxing on the system) so FWIW I have at least one system I wouldn't put a broken 97 on just because of this issue. Dave _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
