Hi Danek,

V čt, 11. 09. 2008 v 19:00, Danek Duvall píše:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 06:52:41PM +0200, Milan Jurik wrote:
> 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pfexec pkg install entire
> 
> This is where you went wrong.  The correct way to update your system is
> with "pkg image-update", which will operate on a clone of your root image.
> See bug 3281.  Where did you get the idea that this was the way to upgrade
> your system?
> 

I was following the instructions for update. The only thing which I
forgot it was to specify "actual be" aka @0.5.11-0.95

Why are you mixing package "update" and "upgrade" in one "command",
allowing these results? It's easy to broke it, too easy.

> I'm not sure what the beadm errors are, though.  Tim or Ethan might answer,
> but you'd be better off asking on caiman-discuss.  That is, assuming that
> it's not broken because of the bad "upgrade".
> 

Probably because of "upgrade", I hadn't problem with beadm before this.
Thanks god it's my experimental laptop dedicated to OpenSolaris upgrades
:-)

Best regards,

Milan

_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to