Hi Ethan, V pá, 12. 09. 2008 v 09:26, Ethan Quach píše: > Danek Duvall wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 06:52:41PM +0200, Milan Jurik wrote: > > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pfexec pkg install entire > >> > > > > This is where you went wrong. The correct way to update your system is > > with "pkg image-update", which will operate on a clone of your root image. > > See bug 3281. Where did you get the idea that this was the way to upgrade > > your system? > > > > I'm not sure what the beadm errors are, though. Tim or Ethan might answer, > > but you'd be better off asking on caiman-discuss. That is, assuming that > > it's not broken because of the bad "upgrade". > > > > That'd be my guess. In build 97, beadm's modules got moved. If you > look at your 'pkg install entire' output, the Removal and Install > phases completed, and the Update phase is where it failed. This would > have meant the modules got moved, and most likely, the /sbin/beadm > binary didn't get updated yet, and hence the import failure when you ran > it. >
Yep. Can beadm to be used from LiveCD, to do recovery by activating previous BE in this case? Best regards, Milan _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
