* Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-17 19:22]: > Stephen Hahn wrote: > > * Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-17 18:30]: > >> And besides which, there has been double-speak from the IPS developers > >> from > >> time to time, that freeform scripting WILL be allowed, via some > >> as-yet-unreleased-and-undocumented SMF/IPS integration... they're just > >> refusing to call it "postinstall script support". > > > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~barts/actuators/ > > > > is still in review. > > Errr... that url is singularly unhelpful for understanding what actuators > are, how they work, and how to use them. It merely spews a list of > .... > well, i'm not even sure how to describe the list. > but it sure isn't anything resembling documentation. The list is the proposed changes to the source code, assembled into a variety of formats. The "------" strings are indicating that there isn't a diff view for a file; generally, new files don't have diffs available.
> One would think "Something in review", would need to have documentation > written on what it is that's actually being reviewed? I was working on a hardcopy, and one of my notes is about the absence of docstrings for the Actuator classes. But Bart pointed out that the intention of this stage of review is to get comment on the basic idea, which is that actions can have one or more attributes that cause side-effects on a live image. - Stephen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
