[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So uninstall your incorporations before upgrading if your the new > catalog doesn't have your previous versions, then? > > Hm. > > -j > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:17:54AM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> This looks okay to me. Just to make sure I understand, 3704 just >>> covers the fact that we have no top level handler for the >>> InventoryException, correct? I didn't see anything that addressed >>> optional dependency lookup, but I thought I'd ask just to be sure. >> I asked Bart about the optional dependency loading, his response was: >> >> "Because if your new pkg plan requires installation of a package, >> you need to make sure it's the right version wrt any optional >> dependencies on that package." >> >> In short, I took that to mean I needed to leave the optional dependency >> loading alone. >> >> This does mean that the client will fail, but at least it will fail and >> the user will know why. >> >> Cheers,
I experimented with this last night. If you make the repo that has only the new packages the preferred repo and and the old one another authority, it works. - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts "You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird." _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
