Rich Burridge wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Otherwise, the changes looks fine (along with solaris.py, I went
>> through a few dozen of the import files but no more!)  From a testing
>> perspective, I assume you did a full import.  Could you please verify
>> that every package manifest in the resulting repo includes the
>> classification field?
>
> Will do. I've just checked in this huge change, and I'll now start a 
> redist_import
> going, then write a python script to check each of the package manifests for
> this line.
I wrote a script to do this. See:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/attachment.cgi?id=645

I ran this against a redist_import repository for build 100a
(viewable internally at http://stard.sfbay:24100) that I've
just created and got the following results:


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pkg/bugs/4100/gate$ python check_dist.py | grep "^No"
No classification for package: babel_install
No classification for package: entire
No classification for package: FSWxorg-client-docs
No classification for package: FSWxorg-clientlibs
No classification for package: FSWxorg-client-programs
No classification for package: FSWxorg-data
No classification for package: FSWxorg-fonts
No classification for package: FSWxorg-headers
No classification for package: FSWxwrtl
No classification for package: redistributable
No classification for package: slim_install
No classification for package: SUNWphp52

I asked Alan (Coopersmith) about the FSW ones. His reply was:

  "Those were all packages from the initial preview builds we no
   longer use.  (Except FSWxorg-fonts, which is used up to build
   100, but is going away in build 101.)

   I don't think any categories are needed, since no one should be
   installing them now - the dependencies were just to make sure
   they got replaced by the right packages on upgrade."

The SUNWphp52 one was an oversight, and I've just added a classification
line for that one (changeset df86b51145ebc9716fa89765e8d5f52bcdb69d1e).

There are no package files in the pkg source workspace to add a 
"classification" line for:

babel_install
entire
redistributable
slim_install

Should they be classified? If so, where should that be done?




_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to