> It's traditional with classification schemes to include the year, so > that you can abandon them later--in our case, when there is the > inevitable recategorization of software in 5 or 10 years. See ACM, > for instance: 1964, 1982, 1991, 1998.
Thanks for the clarification, Stepehen. I had assumed it was something along those lines. And thanks to Rich for updating all the current packages with the initial classification. dsc _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
