On Sat 01 Nov 2008 at 08:14AM, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
>
> Yes, it is better than what we had, so I think getting it in is
> a good idea.
>
> >One thing I was wondering is about what would happen in this scenario:
> >
> > detach zone foo
> > image-update global zone
> > reboot
> > attach zone foo (-u)
> >
> >Will that successfully attach the dataset? I was thinking
> >that it might get confused because the parent BE will be
> >different than what the zone is expecting. Or am I confused?
>
> I think doing it this way means that beadm wouldn't create the
> new zone images when it did the clone. A better order would be:
>
> image-update global zone
> reboot
> detach zone foo
> attach -u zone foo
>
> Thats the concept I've been testing against.
I see, OK. I'll have to think about whether it's important, longer
term, for my scenario to work. I feel like we could implement an
option for the user to say: "this dataset over here, use that (after
some validation)". I think the prototype I did a couple of weeks ago
had a little bit of that idea in it.
-dp
--
Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - blogs.sun.com/dp
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
