Brock Pytlik wrote: > I'm running rc1.5, and I'm seeing the updatemanagernotifier taking 50% > of my CPU, and having a memory footprint of 701M (RSS) 764M (Size). I > know bug 3835[1] covered this but the fix went back well before rc1.5. > Is it expected that I would be seeing this behavior because I passed > through 101a/b, or is this a new problem? When I truss the process, it > just spams: > ioctl(5, FIONREAD, 0x0804714C) = 0 > pollsys(0x083ABBC8, 7, 0x080471E0, 0x00000000) = 0 > > My gconf values, as shown in gconf-editor are set. Specifically, my > refresh period is set to Daily, show_icon_on_startup is off, > show_notify_message is on, and the start_delay is 120. My > /etc/gconf/schemas/updatemanager-preferences.schemas has a date of > 2008-10-30 15:13. Most of my other schemas have a date around 2008-11-14. > > Is it possible that the update to rc1.5 didn't modify the time stamp of > the existing schema file because the file itself had not changed? If so, > this seems like fairly broken behavior. > > > [1] http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3835 > _______________________________________________ > pkg-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss > Just a follow up, DTrace suggests that this is another manifestation of 3835. 0 247348072612 updatemanagernotifier <- do_next_check 0 247348072668 updatemanagernotifier -> do_next_check 0 247348072683 updatemanagernotifier -> is_check_required 0 247348072699 updatemanagernotifier <- is_check_required
Is repeated over and over, and UMN doesn't appear to be doing anything else. Thanks, Brock _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
