Brock Pytlik wrote:
> If Dan, K, and I have the right handle on things, it would take 1-2 days
> to reproduce using the steps you're describing. I'm going to try to put
> together a slightly modified umn which will exhibit the bug in a few
> minutes. If that doesn't work, I'll take the steps you've described. As
> a side note, my ~/.updatemanager/notify/opensolaris-lastcheck exists and
> has a time of last friday in the afternoon, which is roughly when I
> turned UpdateManager on.
Brock,

One thing that came into my mind,
Could you check ownership/permissions of the opensolaris-lastcheck file?

best
Michal
>
> Brock
>
> jmr wrote:
>> Brock - can you:
>> $ pkill updatemanagernotifier
>> $ rm ~/.updatemanager/notify/opensolaris-lastcheck
>> $ /usr/bin/python2.4 /usr/lib/updatemanagernotifier -d
>>
>> If this does not chew CPU then come out of it and run it again:
>> $ /usr/bin/python2.4 /usr/lib/updatemanagernotifier -d
>>
>> And send us the output. I'm trying this out on my machine and its
>> behaving normally, without chewing CPU. I'm running snv_101a on the
>> metal, on a Mac Book Pro (dual core, 4 Meg RAM), what machine are you on?
>>
>> The symptoms you describe are exactly those of 3835. Could you also
>> send me your /usr/lib/updatemanagernotifier and
>> /etc/gconf/schemas/updatemanager-preferences.schemas
>>
>> I'm not at a build machine, we'll look into it tomorrow. Could you
>> give Padraig or myself remote access to the box?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> JR
>>
>> Brock Pytlik wrote:
>>> Brock Pytlik wrote:
>>>> I'm running rc1.5, and I'm seeing the updatemanagernotifier taking
>>>> 50% of my CPU, and having a memory footprint of 701M (RSS) 764M
>>>> (Size). I know bug 3835[1] covered this but the fix went back well
>>>> before rc1.5. Is it expected that I would be seeing this behavior
>>>> because I passed through 101a/b, or is this a new problem? When I
>>>> truss the process, it just spams:
>>>> ioctl(5, FIONREAD, 0x0804714C) = 0
>>>> pollsys(0x083ABBC8, 7, 0x080471E0, 0x00000000) = 0
>>>>
>>>> My gconf values, as shown in gconf-editor are set. Specifically, my
>>>> refresh period is set to Daily, show_icon_on_startup is off,
>>>> show_notify_message is on, and the start_delay is 120. My
>>>> /etc/gconf/schemas/updatemanager-preferences.schemas has a date of
>>>> 2008-10-30 15:13. Most of my other schemas have a date around
>>>> 2008-11-14.
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible that the update to rc1.5 didn't modify the time stamp
>>>> of the existing schema file because the file itself had not changed?
>>>> If so, this seems like fairly broken behavior.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3835
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> pkg-discuss mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
>>> Just a follow up, DTrace suggests that this is another manifestation
>>> of 3835.
>>> 0 247348072612 updatemanagernotifier <- do_next_check
>>> 0 247348072668 updatemanagernotifier -> do_next_check
>>> 0 247348072683 updatemanagernotifier -> is_check_required
>>> 0 247348072699 updatemanagernotifier <- is_check_required
>>>
>>>
>>> Is repeated over and over, and UMN doesn't appear to be doing
>>> anything else.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Brock
>>
>

_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to