Matt Keenan wrote: > I'm chiming in a little late in this one, apologies. > > Are these classifications for defects.opensolaris.org ? > or > bugster ? > or > something else ?
Something else. IPS Packaging classifications. > > If they are for d.o.o. I know we discussed this last week with Leo > and Erwann has an action to put together a list of categories that we > would > like to see created for the desktop stack. > > If this is nothing to do with d.o.o. then ignore me :) Consider yourself ignored. :-) To save me typing another email... Frank, What do you think of Brian's three new sub-categories? > Brian Cameron wrote: >> Rich/Frank: >> >>> I'm just a humble packaging minion. Can you (or somebody else who >>> understands all of this), spell out exactly what you'd liked changed >>> here? >>> Otherwise we are going to spend a lot more time just shuffling the >>> classifications around, each time a new person with individual >>> preferences, >>> looks at the existing set of classifications. >>> >>> I fully understand that the current list of categories / >>> sub-categories >>> might not be perfect. If new ones should be added, then you need to >>> let Frank know. I've added him to the cc: list. >> >> Based on our discussions so far, it seems that we have identified 3 new >> categories/subcategories that would be useful to add. >> >> 1) System->Multimedia Libraries >> >> There are a lot of libraries to support graphics (GIF, TIF, JPEG, >> RSVG), >> video (theora), and audio (musicbrainz, ogg/vorbis, flac, speex, >> libcanberra). It would be nice to put these into a single >> subcategory >> and not clutter up System->Libraries with all of these. >> >> 2) Desktop->Theming >> >> A place to put pacakges which do not contain any code, but simply >> contain >> skins, themes, etc. >> >> 3) Desktop->Core >> >> A category to place packages which make up the desktop itself. >> Things >> like the panel, default applets. Perhaps this would be a better >> category >> for gnome-session, and we could get rid of Desktop->Session and >> instead >> use a slightly broader category for foundational desktop modules. >> >> Just my thoughts, >> >> Brian >> _______________________________________________ >> pkg-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss > _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
