Ed McKnight wrote:
Hi Joseph,
Why exclude this concept from os image? You're proposing a new actuator,
so why speak of "replace" service frmi's?
thx, --emk
Ed,
It's my understanding that the proposed UserImageActuator implementation
may not be acceptable for use on an OpenSolaris system image because
the configuration logic is run in the context of the package install
session -- which may not be the same as the context of the running
OS image that you are installing into. The SMF based actuator is
designed to address this.
User images have different requirements and priorities. Hence the
alternative actuator implementation for user images.
Joe
Joseph Di Pol wrote:
The Update Center team has a need for a cross-platform Actuator
implementation that supports User Images.
Tom and I have put together a proposal that we'd like to get
feedback on:
http://wiki.updatecenter.java.net/Wiki.jsp?page=UC22UserImageActuators
Keep in mind this implementation would only be used on user images and
would not be in play for OpenSolaris system images.
If there isn't an RFE on this already I'll go ahead and create one.
Joe
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
