On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:10:37PM -0800, Bart Smaalders wrote: > So.... you have two packages, which differ in version: > > pkg://coips-80/[email protected],5.11-0.108.33284:20090224T050443Z > pkg:/[email protected],5.11-0.108:20090307T003526Z > > Your dependency likely specifies: > > pkg://coips-80/[email protected],5.11-0.108 > > It will prefer the newer package.
I think part of (if not all of) the confusion is that it got the "right" version -- ie, the older version from the preferred authority -- of the package Ed specified on the commandline, but didn't have that behavior for its dependencies. I'm not sure whether that's deliberate in the coding, but it's decidedly confusing, and therefore busted. Regardless, you're right that the right answer for this particular situation is fat packages. Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
