On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:20:36AM -0800, Ed McKnight wrote: > That's fine--looking at the definition of the fields in pkg(5) I can > see it this way. But I had come to think of the the specific value we > added (.33284) as arbitrary in its own field rather than being part of > the branch and indicating a version. I stand corrected. Is there any > thought of allowing non-integer values anywhere in here?
Nope. We've talked about having a package attribute that would indicate a "human-readable" version that would allow for things like "3.0.4c" and "4.0alpha7" and so on, but it wouldn't take part in the version algebra. Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
