* Danek Duvall <[email protected]> [2009-03-26 21:13]: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:08:14PM -0700, Rich Burridge wrote: > > > PROPOSAL: where possible the "basename" part of the new > > package name will aim for uniqueness. Eg. > > "developer/netbeans/library/libnb-java" instead > > of "developer/netbeans/library/java". In some > > cases, the "basename" will retain the same name as the > > original package name. > > Seriously, why bother with all the duplication? Why not just > "developer/libnb-java"?
So that the packages have names that both categorize them and separate them from packages that are less closely related (while minimizing basename collisions). - Stephen -- [email protected] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
