Danek Duvall wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:08:14PM -0700, Rich Burridge wrote:PROPOSAL: where possible the "basename" part of the new package name will aim for uniqueness. Eg. "developer/netbeans/library/libnb-java" instead of "developer/netbeans/library/java". In some cases, the "basename" will retain the same name as the original package name.Seriously, why bother with all the duplication? Why not just "developer/libnb-java"?
My understanding it is to keep all the NetBeans packages grouped together in the new naming hierarchy and to satisfy the wish of the NetBeans product team to retain the old names as the "basenames". Stephen and/or David can correct me if I'm missing something here. _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
