On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:53:17PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote: > I didn't intend it for contents or info, but in the case of install -n, > would that mean we would only display a generic license failure message > if some licenses required acceptance and the user didn't provide the > acceptance somehow?
Why would install -n fail because of a license? It's not putting bits on your disk, so there's no reason to accept the license. Perhaps it should mention that one or more license will need explicit acceptance, and tell the user what options to use when installing for real, but that's as far as I'd go. Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
