On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:17:12AM -0700, Tom Mueller wrote: > I'm not demanding anything. I'm just making an observation that this is > a change that would effect users of an API that has been claimed to be a > public interface. > > Actually since Python is so loosely typed, there probably isn't even a > requirement that a object of a class derived from ProgressTracker be > passed into ImageInterface as long as the object implements methods with > the right names. But given this change, users of ImageInterface will be > effected even if they don't use ProgressTracker.
Ah, I read this as an objection to Shawn's changes because it changed an allegedly public interface. Sorry for the confusion. -j _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
