On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 07:48:42AM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:57:28AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:22:50AM +0530, Venky wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 08:03:43PM -0700, Bart Smaalders wrote: > > > > How about one to cause the operation > > > > to fail if a new BE is required? > > > > > > Don't care for this much, unless this would be the interface to > > > figure out if an install would need a reboot, as Nico suggested. > > > Though for that case, I prefer a command which would just tell me if > > > a reboot would be required and make no changes to the image at all. > > > Maybe "pkg install -n"? > > > > I think you're right that this is not as useful as the other option. > > Would I want to wait twice for pkg to create a plan? Probably not. So > > I think I've changed my mind on this one. > > Though computing image plans should be *far* quicker once Bart's SAT solver > comes back, we've tossed around the idea of caching plans. We could > automatically save them when doing -n or --fail-on-reboot (or whatever), > and reload them if they hadn't been invalidated.
OK then, I'm back to my previous position :) > Besides, I'm not sure if I really want to have "install -n[v]" be > parseable. Huh? _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
