Antonello Cruz writes: > Volker A. Brandt wrote: > > Maybe a quick fix could be to enhance SMF with an additional state: > > > > legacy_run, disabled, maintenance, online, package > > > > And give "svcs" a "-t <type>" switch with a behavior similar to > > "zfs list -t snapshot". > > > > So "svcs -t package" would list those services, but "svcs -a" would not. > That would break the meaning of svcs -a The -a means "Show all > services".
Yes. That was intentional. Like "zfs list" which will show all objects except snapshots. They are hidden until you specify the type snapshot as an option to the list argument. > I don't agree > this is a problem. What are you trying to accomplish that you need to > use svcs -a and the output of the services used by pkg(5) gets in the way? Reduce clutter. Protect the admin from seeing things that look like services but really are metainformation storage containers for packaged objects. Regards -- Volker -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Volker A. Brandt Consulting and Support for Sun Solaris Brandt & Brandt Computer GmbH WWW: http://www.bb-c.de/ Am Wiesenpfad 6, 53340 Meckenheim Email: v...@bb-c.de Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 10513 Schuhgröße: 45 Geschäftsführer: Rainer J. H. Brandt und Volker A. Brandt _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list pkg-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
