Rich Burridge wrote: > Until it's a deal breaker, I'd like to leave it the way it is (i.e. all > new files under 125/). When I spoke with David on this during a > pre-review he indicated that everything should be in 125.
Sure, no problem. > >You don't mention much about devlink.tab, though I see you added at least > >one entry for it into a new action. Should that be dropped, too, and have > >its "empty" file delivered? > > I'll have to check, but it might already be an empty file initially > (apart from a large comment). Okay, if so, great. > >I took a quick look at the attachments to 2217 to swee what difference > >you've found. I assume a bunch of these are due to non-redistributable > >drivers, which makes sense. But where are the extra entries coming from? > > Which extra ones do you mean? Can you give an example? The ones generally under the heading "the following entries do not appear in XXX in the image". For instance, in the sun4v version, there's clone:nge and nge:* which I believe should be there on the opensolaris image. Also the nxge and pcieb driver_aliases entries have changed on sparc, and it's not clear why. Basically, if you could explain each difference, even if they're simply a problem with your verification script, I'd be more comfortable. Thanks, Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
