[email protected] wrote:
I'd appreciate a review of the following modified webrevhttp://cr.opensolaris.org/~comay/webrev-6482/ that covers changes for the following set of issues
I've now looked at the rest of it. Just one very minor nit and a question: * Is there a reason why the entries in minor_perm.i386 and minor_perm.sparc can't be sorted by driver name rather than keeping them in major device number order? * I can now see that the minor_perm files for Nevada build #124 have two entries each for the e1000g driver: intel/minor_perm:e1000g:* 0666 root sys intel/minor_perm:e1000g:* 0666 root root sparc-sun4v/minor_perm:e1000g:* 0666 root sys sparc-sun4v/minor_perm:e1000g:* 0666 root root sparc/minor_perm:e1000g:* 0666 root sys sparc/minor_perm:e1000g:* 0666 root root I take it from your change to .../125/common/SUNWintgige that 'perms="* 0666 root sys"' is the correct one? _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
