* Is there a reason why the entries in minor_perm.i386
and minor_perm.sparc can't be sorted by driver name
rather than keeping them in major device number order?
They could be sorted but I'd prefer to leave them in the same order
they're currently in Nevada.
* I can now see that the minor_perm files for Nevada build #124
have two entries each for the e1000g driver:
intel/minor_perm:e1000g:* 0666 root sys
intel/minor_perm:e1000g:* 0666 root root
sparc-sun4v/minor_perm:e1000g:* 0666 root sys
sparc-sun4v/minor_perm:e1000g:* 0666 root root
sparc/minor_perm:e1000g:* 0666 root sys
sparc/minor_perm:e1000g:* 0666 root root
I take it from your change to .../125/common/SUNWintgige
that 'perms="* 0666 root sys"' is the correct one?
Yes, this was an adjustment due to the following fix in build 125
6681751 e1000g minor_perm inconsistent between package
postinstall script and default minor_perm file
Thanks for the review.
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
