Shawn Walker wrote: > Looking closer, I can't find anything that I can say with certainty is > wrong. Although I did notice it uses a rather simplistic algorithm for > trimming the filenames in the report, so 'pkg.depotd' becomes 'pkg' as an > example.
Yup. A bug I intend to file, but it's low priority, so I haven't bothered yet. > I also was slightly confused by seeing the line that defines the function > as 'covered', but not any part of the function itself in some cases (see > client/image.py). I'm assuming that means that the definition was > evaluated by python, but the function wasn't executed. Yup. Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
