Liane Praza wrote: > Danek Duvall wrote: > >Rich Burridge wrote: > > > >> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=12972 > >> The various clusters listed in redist_cluster need to have consolidation > >> lines > > > >Perhaps I missed it in all the email, but I don't understand the > >rationale behind this. The bug neither explains it, nor > >references another bug which does. And it seems very sketchy to > >me to shove "consolidation" tags into packages which aren't part > >of any particular consolidation (but are all defined in the "ips" > >consolidation). > > Fundamentally, I think the question is for David: long term, do you > want the consolidations to deliver these group packages, or do you > think they should be defined at the distro level. > > I could see it going either way, and it is of course mutable. Right > now, that makes the assumption that the consolidations would have to > do it. (And I'll have to buy back the ON-owned group packages into > ON when we deliver.) > > It seems like it would be easier for now to have them all go into > ips-incorporation, but that's an unnecessary intermediate step if > David really wants the consolidations he's identified to deliver > them.
That still doesn't explain to me why the tag is necessary at all. Again, I think I'm failing to remember something. Is this simply that entire will incorporate nothing but consolidation incorporations, and not any of these group packages, and thus because these group packages need to be incorporated, they need to be part of one or more consolidation incorporations? If so, why must entire incorporate nothing but consolidation incorporations? Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
